The current State Senate district lines in Southern Brooklyn, showing District 27 (former Senator Kruger's district) and District 22 (Golden's). It is known as one of the worst examples of gerrymandering in New York State. The latest proposal is no better.

Looking at political district maps for Brooklyn and the city, you might think you’re gazing at an elaborate jigsaw puzzle. Yet, the process seems to get more complicated, not to mention inequitable, when the lines are redrawn every 10 years.

Nevertheless, the best laid district lines of Democrats or Republicans usually don’t count much towards a representative democracy, but rather for the ruling political party.

Consequently, all state legislative seats are on the ballot this year and the political districts’ pie must be remapped before the elections. Naturally, each party prefers a bigger slice, even after Republicans promised to put an end to gerrymandering, which leaves one party with an advantage over its opponents, and establish an independent redistricting process two years ago when they regained control of the state Senate.

However, as politicians are prone to do, the GOP has broken that promise and is trying to impose politically advantageous boundaries, including a whole new district, either upstate near Albany or in Nassau County, in order to maintain and safeguard its slim majority.

So much for guarantees by politicians, who, more often than not, tend to say whatever they think the voting public wants to hear, then, as soon as they are ensconced in their seat in the legislature, they go their own way knowing incumbents rarely lose in state elections.

The new state senate lines for Brooklyn, revealed on February 2, eliminate the 27th district, which was represented by Carl Kruger for over a decade until he pled guilty to corruption charges and resigned last December. That district includes real estate from Mill Basin, west to Brighton Beach. If it is purged, the GOP will expand the districts currently represented by state senators Mary Golden, a Republican, and John Sampson, a Democrat, who would add Mill Basin and Bergen Beach to communities, including Canarsie, he already represents.

In response to the proposed controversial boundaries drawn up by a legislative force, which prompted a lawsuit, Brooklyn Federal District Court Judge Dora Irizarry recommended that the state’s stalled redistricting process be supervised by a court-appointed special master to ensure it complies with state and federal laws.

Two weeks ago, another lawsuit was filed by Senate Democrats challenging the GOP plan, which has drawn criticism from advocates who oppose district changes they maintain are unfair to minorities. Republicans insist that the convoluted formula is valid according to New York’s Constitution.

The proposed remapping would also make pointless the special March 20 election for Kruger’s spot between Democratic candidate City Councilman Lew Fidler and Republican opponent David Storobin.

Political insiders insist there’s a slim chance the proposed lines will be adopted, since Governor Andrew Cuomo vowed to veto any partisan remapping after his request for an independent redistricting commission was declined. Let’s hope the governor doesn’t agree to any compromise that would lead him renege, like the Republicans did.

Independent activists called the GOP plan “the most gerrymandered lines” in recent history. Former Mayor Ed Koch, who has advocated independent redistricting, said he was disappointed in the proposal and a victory “lies with the enemies of reform.”

Therefore, the only way to alter and impartially balance subsequent redistricting is to change the Constitution and let the citizens of New York vote on it. Although that creates another challenge: making voters understand what’s really at stake and getting a sufficient, concerned number of them to participate in the process.

However, some registered voters are so apathetic to politics they have no clue as to who represents them on the local, state and federal levels. So it comes as no surprise that few even know — or care — about district boundaries, whether it’s for the City Council, the state Assembly or Senate or the U.S. Congress.

Come to think of it, it’s easier to solve the weekly Sheepshead Bites picture puzzle than it is to make sense out of jagged, legislated political districts.

As our state politicians pat themselves on the back for instituting some meaningful recent reforms, they should be embarrassed about neglecting practical district lines that only give the ruling party an advantage, not the people who elected them.

More importantly, voters need to wake up, smell the scam and send a clear-cut message when they go to the polls in November: “We’re mad as hell and we’re not going to take you gerrymandering anymore!”

Neil S. Friedman is a veteran reporter and photographer, and spent 15 years as an editor for a Brooklyn weekly newspaper. He also did public relations work for Showtime, The Rolling Stones and Michael Jackson. Friedman contributes occasional columns on life, culture and politics in Sheepshead Bay.

Related posts

  • http://www.njluxurymotors.com Arthur Borko

    The way our districts are outlined make me sick. They really need to just follow simple geographic and neighborhood lines.

    • http://www.brucebrodinsky.com Bruce B

      My understanding is that the Supreme Court at one time or another simply refused to rule on the vagueness of gerrymandering.  There’s GOT to be something done about it, but as usual, politicians (and articles such as the above), would rather try to score political points than actually DO something about it. Everyone knows it’s wrong, but nothing’s been done for a zillion years.

    • NSF

      If only…

    • BrooklynBus

      Did you know that was the original purpose of Community Board District Lines?

      All political districts, police precincts, fire districts, sanitation districts, etc were supposed to follow the lines of the Community Boards or were to be an agglomeration of them.  For example Congressional District 9 would be a collection of 8 Community Boards for example.

      That was supposed to improve our democracy and public participation my making it easier to know which district you were in and who to complain to about what.  Sounded like a great idea to me but that is not what the politicians wanted. 

      They did not want more democracy, just wanted more for their party, so this plan went the way of converting from the English system to the metric system. That stopped after soda bottles stopped selling quarts and started selling liters. So instead of everything being converted, we end up with a more confusing system than before. Now we use a Metenglish system.

  • http://www.brucebrodinsky.com Bruce B

    I just love this article. Gerrymandering has been around since the dinosaurs, been used by Democrats and Republicans alike, but suddenly the GOP is THE big gerrymandering villain.

       A very slanted article. I’m surprised at Bites.  The article bites.

    • Tinman

      THE GOP promised not to gerrymander when they regained control the state Senate and went back on that campaign promise. What a surprise!                  And guess you missed or misunderstood this line:  ”…the best laid district lines of Democrats or Republicans usually don’t count much towards a representative democracy, but rather for the ruling political party.” BOTH are to blame historically, but GOP takes prize this time.

    • Bklynwrtr

       And Bruce B bites the big one!

      • http://www.brucebrodinsky.com Bruce B

        Only when it’s a quarter pounder!

    • ES

      Normally I’d be inclined to agree with you but, without actually having read the article, it should be pointed out that this was run as an opinion piece. Neil always writes very liberal, which is not by any means a criticism of him or his writing. I’ve taken heat in the past for doing just the opposite.

      • http://www.brucebrodinsky.com Bruce B

        I don’t usually look at who wrote the article, I’ve never had to, all the stuff here is quality work.

           I guess this follows all the media these days. Opinions used to be confined to op-ed or editorial, easily identified, so one knew it was opinion.

            Now the media freely puts its slant on news without informing the reader. I wish news was news, I wouldn’t have to read Cnn AND Foxnews to  determine what the heck the true situation is because I sure as heck know I’m not getting an accurate view from either one.

        • NSF

          You don’t have to “read between the lines” to understand that this piece was posted, as ES pointed out, as an OPINION piece not a featured or hard news.
          As a matter of fact, it was suggested I write an op-ed on this  issue.

          • http://www.brucebrodinsky.com Bruce B

            Had I known is was an “op-ed” piece, I would not have posted my criticism. But how is it so obvious? The Ny Times writes pieces like this on its front page. So does the NY Post or Foxnews. And these sources will tell you they are reporting “just the news”.

               Anyway, it’s a good article your wrote about the subject, my criticism notwithstanding.

          • ES

            I was reading a piece in the Post yesterday about Nick Spano and, into the second paragraph, I was thinking, “Geez, this writer — these editors! — are such sanctimonious, brazen creeps,” and it compelled me to back up and check to make sure that what I was reading was an opinion column. It was… amazingly… but that piece notwithstanding, all of the papers these days blur the lines considerably and it’s just plain irresponsible journalism. Good luck in trying to find impartial news anywhere (except on Sheepshead Bites, of course — so much for my impartiality!) Even when you’re reading stuff that isn’t necessarily force-feeding you outright slanted diatribe, you still have the pleasure of reading manipulated facts hiding beneath the transparent cloak of respectability, in the form of something like The New York Times. Not that you or I would ever read the Times, but still, the bar has been lowered significantly, I think past the point of no return, and it is very sad.

  • http://twitter.com/Lostinservice Lostinservice

    Why is this still being done by individuals and by hand (software assisted is still by hand)? Map the districts using software that’s completely open source so that the algorithm is available for public scrutiny.

    It’s a tall order because optimization for something like this can be incredible complex but why we’re not at least attempting this bothers me to no end. It’s 2012 not 1912.

  • Pingback: State Politicians Get Jiggy With Redistricting Proposal – Sheepshead Bites « Abolish Pest Control Serving Bergen Beach, Brooklyn, New York

  • Pingback: State Politicians Get Jiggy With Redistricting Proposal – Sheepshead Bites « Abolish Pest Control Serving Millbasin, Brooklyn, New York

  • http://profiles.google.com/jonsuperb Jonas MacFarquhar

    It is time to for impartial mathematical redistricting  http://sourceforge.net/projects/bard/