Leaders of the Manhattan Beach Community Group (MBCG) launched a three-pronged political offensive last night, two against familiar enemies – the Manhattan Beach Neighborhood Association (MBNA) and the Department of Transportation (DOT) – and a third against the neighborhood’s only representative to the City Council – Councilman Michael C. Nelson.

While topics during the group’s monthly meetings bounced back and forth between security, traffic safety and beachside barbecuing, the tone remained consistently hostile. They lashed out against the MBNA for their attempt to ban charcoal grilling in Manhattan Beach and they threatened a civil uprising against the DOT. But some of the choicest words were reserved for Councilman Nelson, who MBCG President Ira Zalcman said has broken promises, ignored the community and plays the politics of division in the neighborhood’s leadership struggles.

The publicity the neighborhood has received lately – whether it be from the feud between groups, the shenanigans of politicians, or some residents’ “exclusionary” proposals – has Zalcman feeling “humiliated” as a resident.

“I’m embarrassed when I go places and tell people I’m from Manhattan Beach,” he said. “I sometimes say I’m from Sheepshead Bay because I don’t want to get into it.”

 

Councilman Nelson Doesn’t Share Our Priorities

Among the many fires lit last night is a now-public spar with Councilman Nelson, who was not in attendance when Zalcman let loose a five-minute fusillade of criticism [video at top].

The segment began with Zalcman talking about reasons he’s embarrassed to tell people he lives in Manhattan Beach, beginning with State Senator Carl Kruger, who faces more than 100 years of jail time for corruption charges. He used the December 26 blizzard and the community’s critique of city response inefficiencies to segue into Nelson, who responded to criticism of his office during the storm by calling them “freaking lunatics” (Zalcman misquoted the councilman as saying “freaking idiots.”). But the blasting didn’t end there; Zalcman continued his offensive by dishing on what he perceives as the councilman’s “divisive” comments, apathy and selfishness.

“Just two weeks ago he was making unecessary, divisive comments about this group,” said Zalcman. “Mike Nelson takes no interest in any of the ideas or projects we as the MBCG have discussed. He has stood silent with his hands folded when we … suffered the horrible deaths of a 4-year-old boy on Oriental Boulevard, an 18-year-old on Oriental Boulevard, and a 52-year-old on Shore Boulevard. Not one word from him. Silence is what he spoke. Yet when it comes to him driving to his new office on Voorhies Avenue, he speaks loudly.”

Zalcman was referring to the councilman’s recent proposal to alter Voorhies Avenue into a one-way strip between Ocean Avenue and Sheepshead Bay Road, an issue he took up only after moving his offices one block away. Though the traffic may be bad at this location, Zalcman said no one has ever died from an accident there, unlike three problem spots in Manhattan Beach that the group has been pushing to see addressed. Aside from serving his own personal needs, according to Zalcman, Nelson has done little to fight for the traffic safety initiatives they’ve requested.

A list of “broken promises” also litters the relationship between the MBCG and Nelson, according to Zalcman. He pointed to a promise the councilman made four or five years ago to direct funding to relocating and improving the dog run – money that never materialized.

But worst of all, according to Zalcman, is Nelson’s silence on the latest issue in Manhattan Beach: the MBNA’s proposed ban on charcoal grilling that his group sees as exclusionary and racist.

“All in all, the thing that really and truly upsets me the most, and what I know in my bones, is that today [Nelson] should stand up and denounce racism, hatred and discrimination wherever and from whomever,” Zalcman said. “He should defend the rights of all families to use a public beach. He should be a councilman that represents everybody, and not just a few people.”

 

About Those Barbecues

The barbecue ban and the group that proposed it – the MBNA – was another target of the group’s ire. Both Zalcman and MBNA Traffic Commissioner Judy Baron spoke at length about the proposal, which they said was based on frivolous conclusions about health in order to exclude poor people and minorities from using the beach.

The group passed a motion to oppose the demand of the MBNA to eliminate the barbecue pits from Manhattan Beach Park until “such time as there is scientific proof that barbecue smoke is harmful to human health the designated barbecue pits … should remain for the use and enjoyment of the public.”

The criticism started with Zalcman giving a brief history on why he decided to run for president of the group in 2007.

He said he was “appalled and disgusted as a human being” when he attended a June meeting that year, where a motion was put forward to privatize Manhattan Beach, with one member going so far as to suggest an electrified fence. The group voted down the proposals and rejected derogatory references to people of color. Zalcman, a child of Holocaust survivors, said he ran so that future proposals like that would have a staunch opponent.

According to Zalcman, the latest push to ban barbecuing echoes the desire to privatize the beach, seeded with code words for hate and bigotry.

“Three years ago, some of your neighbors who have gone on to form another group spoke the code words of hate” such as crime, different types of people and litter, Zalcman said. “All that language, as far as I’m concerned, are code words of discrimination. That hope of theirs to privatize the beach … is very much still alive. It’s very much on the table. Don’t think for one second that it went away. It’s here, and I say this as fact.”

The MBNA made the case for banning charcoal barbecuing on the beach earlier this month, when they voted unanimously to send letters to city agencies demanding that barbecuing be banned and the charcoal pits uprooted from the park, a move that would eliminate one of the borough’s seven parks that legally allow grills. The vote was made after the group’s president, Dr. Alan Ditchek brought up a recent study linking airborne particulate matter with elevated incidents of stroke.

“This is a fantastic leap, even for them,” said Zalcman of the stroke study. “Instead of realizing that the reality is that families, parents and their children, visiting the beach to barbecue are not the ones that commit crimes … in fact, we should encourage more family activities to attract them.”

Judy Baron, the MBCG Traffic Committee chairperson – and also a commissioner on the Interstate Environmental Commission, a water and air pollution control agency – also lambasted the stroke claim. She said the article discusses short- and long-term exposure to air pollution in developing countries, and that it concluded that there was a possibility that under certain circumstances pollution could cause stroke, but urged more scientific research.

“Linking barbecue smoke to this report is not only inaccurate but it’s a quantum leap to an erroneous conclusion, because that’s not what the report was discussing,” Baron said. “There is no scientific data that states that barbecue smoke is detrimental to the environment” or to humans.

“The bottom line is that if you’re going to make a motion … to deprive people of their right to do something, there sure as hell better be a good reason for doing it, and it better be in this instance a good scientific reason,” she added.

 

But Wait, What About The DOT?

In their newfound venom for Councilman Mike Nelson as well as the revived issue of exclusionary politics in Manhattan Beach, the group didn’t forget to throw barbs – and an ultimatum – towards their oldest of foes: the Department of Transportation.

The group revealed that they had a sit-down meeting with Department of Transportation Brooklyn Commissioner Joseph Palmieri on March 29, which Traffic Committee chair Judy Baron described as “screwed up, royally.”

Baron said she took issue with Palmieri’s contention that zebra lines stop speeding, while traffic lights do not. She brought with her photos, documents and more that she said proved people are abusing the zebra stripes and racing down Oriental Boulevard.

Ultimately, the group appears to have won a few promises from Palmieri. But feeling scorned by the DOT’s bungled implementations of other recent initiatives, which Baron said included poorly placed or ambiguous signage and unenforced daylighting, the group remains leery about whether the agency will deliver effectively on their promises.

They’re also feeling slighted by the commissioner and his aides, who Baron said didn’t deliver the amount of respect they deserved.

“He listened a lot. The one thing I will tell you is that he never took a note. He never wrote anything down,” Baron said. “His community affairs person sat there and Ira and I saw her doodling, and [Community Board 15 Chairperson Theresa Scavo] saw her doodling, and the other gentleman who was there didn’t take notes either.”

To put pressure on the department, the group is issuing an ultimatum: if no action is taken in the next few weeks, they’ll be considering additional measures, including civil disobedience. This option was first considered in October 2010 following Evan Svirsky’s death, and was set aside until they attempted a petition. President Ira Zalcman said the petition is up to 1,400 signatures; when it reaches 2,000, they intend to take more extreme measures in their dealings with the DOT.

Related posts

  • Kon

    Everybody who lives in Manhattan Beach is retarded.

    • Anonymous

      and Wealthy.

      But think of it this way……. If there ever (gd forbid) was a Tsunami……..They’d be under water First.

  • Anonymous

    Empire strikes back! lol

  • http://www.facebook.com/pages/Erica-Sherman-Photographer/156144554406226?ref=mf ES

    Excellent coverage…really. I don’t live in Manhattan Beach, so I don’t have a dog in this fight, but I think for if there was a Pulitzer for (I so hate using this word) “hyperlocal” news coverage, this post should win that prize.

  • http://www.flickr.com/photos/lisanne001 Lisanne!

    Civil disobedience? Not a very effective method in this instance. Manhattan Beach is a peninsula, it would only be noticed by other Manhattan Beach residents. Protest in front of City Hall if you want to get attention.

  • Bklyn Tiger

    Does this DUMB ASS have a job?
    Zalcman or what ever his name is must get laid or take some mental medication!!!

  • Bklyn Tiger

    Does this IDIOT have a job?
    Zalcman must to get laid ASAP and take some mental medication.

  • Bklyn Tiger

    Feel very bad for Ira Zalcmafor of Dover Street.
    As most people look at him as a joke.
    He is probably sad, lonely and agree.
    He wants to be the King of Manhattan Bitch.
    And everyone should bend over to his needs.
    He must get laid ASAP and get some medication for his mental illness.

    • Bklyn Tiger

      And who is deleting all the other messages talking against Ira Zalcman?

      • http://www.nedberke.com Ned Berke

        There are plenty of comments against Zalcman on this website that have not been deleted. I’m deleting yours, though, because they’re senseless personal attacks and you’re using multiple names. Cut it out or you’ll be banned.

  • LinK

    Yes, noticed the same.
    Any comment against Ira Zalcman is being deleted.
    Is he is also the editor for the web-site?

  • Anonymous

    I wonder what MBCG did to piss off Nelson so much. Around three years ago I went to Nelson’s office with a problem and told them that the MBCG supported me. Nelson’s Chief of Staff told me ” Well if the Manhattan Beach Community Group is for it, then we’re against it.”

    It’s also a known fact that Ditchik, President of the Manhattan Beach Neighborhood Association is best of friends with Nelson. That makes me wonder why all of a sudden Zalcman changes his position to pro-barbecuing when last year he called for an end to it. I bet he feels that most of the larger community is pro-barbecuing, so this way he comes across as the good guy and somehow his position will spell the demise of the MBNA. I see all this posturing as political and nothing more.

    I really can’t disagree with anything that you quoted he or Judy Baron saying at the meeting. I especially agree with his assessment of the ban as being exclusionary and racist. But how innocent is his group when they have been the prime proponent for the ban against summer parking all these years?

    • http://www.flickr.com/photos/lisanne001 Lisanne!

      There was a time when these groups operated more or less within their own orbit, influenced only by pressures from within. Oh, the local papers might devote a few paragraphs here and there to the goings on of these groups, both proper and improper, but most people read the local papers for the classified section. Blogs have changed the awareness level, but they have yet to be a real catalyst for direct participation. Thusly, the powers that be stay the powers that be. There is however, a wolf gnawing at the door. So Ira Zalcman suddenly develops a civic conscience, and the at large membership of his group follow suit.

      It shall remain to be seen whether an influx of new participation will occur in the long term. But Zalcman and other community leaders are probably are already giving that possibility much consideration.

  • LinK

    Why not let the PUBLIC decide what comments are “senseless” and what comments are good. Is it not a way of democracy, where the MAJORITY rules? Why is ONE person deciding what comments are Ok and not OK?
    Do you smell conflict of interest?
    Do you smell dictatorship? (1 person being the judge? Jury?&”comment” executioner?)
    Do you smell “one sided” opinions?
    Welcome to America (freedom) or AmerIRAN (one person ideas)

    • LinK

      Why not let the PUBLIC decide what comments are “senseless” and what comments are good. Is it not democracy, where MAJORITY rules?
      Why is ONE person deciding what comments are Ok & not OK?
      Do you smell conflict of interest?
      Do you smell dictatorship?
      One person being the judge? Jury? & “comment” executioner?
      Do you smell “one sided” opinions?
      Welcome to America (freedom) or AmerIRAN (one person ideas for all)

    • Anonymous

      It is Ned’s website. He has the right to decide what he considers offensive or not appropriate. If you are at all familiar with this website, you will find that he is very fair. For him to remove a post, it really has to be bad. He is very fair and gives everyone an opportunity to speak. He has no problem with viewpoints that differ from his.

      • LinK

        The slogan said “SHEEPSHEAD BAY’S ONLY INDEPENDENT NEWS BLOG”
        The word INDEPENDENT should be changed to Ned’s opinion.

        Why doesn’t Ned re-post the comment and you will see that what I said is 100% true!!! and is “not bad”. Unless Ned is related to Mr. Ira Zalcman and sometimes the truth hurts and people can’t handle the truth!!!

    • http://www.flickr.com/photos/lisanne001 Lisanne!

      Ned doesn’t remove comments often. He has allowed a lot of remarks to stand that, were I running a site, would have been removed. Ned has explained why he has done so in this instance.

      In a democracy you are quite free, to go to another website if you don’t like following the rules for proper conduct of this one.

      • LinK

        The slogan said “SHEEPSHEAD BAY’S ONLY INDEPENDENT NEWS BLOG”
        The word INDEPENDENT should be changed to Ned’s opinion.

        Why doesn’t Ned re-post the comment and you will see that what I said is 100% true!!!

        • Anonymous

          I’ve found this blog to be far from “Ned’s Opinion” as opposed to other blogs where it is quite easy to see where the blogger stands. Ned always presents all sides of the issue when he is able to. Maybe what you said was 100% true. But look again at the manner in which you said it. Did it come across as a “senseless personal attack” as Ned would call it? Perhaps if you try reposting it again stating just the facts, not accusing someone of something without backing up your statements, he will not delete it. I’m curious to see what happens.

          I really doubt it if Ned is related to Mr. Zalcman and has not taken a side on this issue. He provided a well-balanced article showing all points of view. If he publishes one senseless personal attack, that only encourages others, and before you know it, all the comments are nothing more than an out of control mob or fist fight or words which nobody wants to waste their time reading. He has to maintain order.

          • LinK

            Thank you for the response. I responded to you above.

        • http://www.flickr.com/photos/lisanne001 Lisanne!

          “Independent” does not mean that Ned is without a personal opinion. It does mean that his opinion is not reflected in the content of articles. He will in most instances distance himself emotionally from the subject matter he writes about. I have no idea what his opinion of Mr Zalcman is, and Ned probably would not discuss it were I to ask. I do know, however, that there are limits to what he considers to be proper behavior for those posting comments on the various articles. He has no intentions of allowing the site to be used for the posting of information that is possibly libelous in nature.

          • LinK

            responded to you , above. Thank you

  • LinK

    Isn’t Independent news BOTH side(s) of the story? Let’s slightly analyze story!!!

    Manhattan Beach Community Group (MBCG) “launched… offensive last night against… familiar enemies… MBNA and the DOT – and a third against City Council – Councilman Michael C. Nelson”

    Why doesn’t Ned let MBNA, DOT and/or Councilman Michael C. Nelson respond with their side of the story?

    Why is Ned saying “enemies?”

    Is Ira Zalcman competent to represent Manhattan Beach?

    Zaleman of Dover Street feels “humiliated and embarrassed to tell people that he from Manhattan Beach… I sometimes say I’m from Sheepshead Bay.”

    Would you want Borough President Marty embarrassed to tell people that he is from Brooklyn? and say that he is from Queens?
    Is this a normal mind talking? Is Ira Zalcman competent to represent Manhattan Beach?

    Zalcman said “Nelson takes no interest in any of the ideas or projects we as the MBCG have discussed.” Zalcman used the word ANY.
    Do you think it’s true?

    Who initially asked for the PLANTS on Oriental Blvd? and who helped REMOVING those same plants (sponsored by tax payers money) ? DOT… Judy Baron described as “screwed up, royally… They’re also feeling slighted by the commissioner and his aides, who Baron said didn’t deliver the amount of respect they deserved”.

    The commissioner must bend over to Manhattan Beach needs?
    If DOT is an enemy, why did DOT remove the Planters?

    why does Manhattan beach has NO PARKING ANYTIME between May and September on weekends?
    Do people go to the BEACH in the SUMMER or winter?
    Your parking is LIMITED in the summer in Manhattan Beach.

    What other area in NYC have NO PARKING ANYTIME during the summer (when the public uses the Beach the most?

    Zalcman pointed to “a promise the councilman made four or five years ago to direct funding to relocating and improving the dog run – money that never materialized”

    Do you think, with budget cuts, it’s easy to find money for a dog run?

    Would you rather see $ go for a dog run or senior centers?

    Can’t you take your dog on Manhattan Beach down Oriental Blvd? Shore Pkway? By the beach?

    Zalcman, said “ [Nelson] should stand up and denounce racism, hatred and discrimination wherever and from whomever… He should defend the rights of all families to use a public beach. He should be a councilman that represents everybody, and not just a few people.”
    Except for Lunatic Zlacman, do you believe that Nelson is racist?
    According to Zalcman, “the latest push to ban barbecuing echoes the desire to privatize the beach, seeded with code words for hate and bigotry”.

    How will Manhattan Beach be privatizing?

    President Ira Zalcman said the petition is up to 1,400 signatures; when it reaches 2,000, they intend to take more extreme measures in their dealings with the DOT.
    Would you vote for Zalcman?
    Did anyone check if the signature are authentic?

    • Anonymous

      I’ll address a few of your comments. You ask for both sides of the story. Ned already presented MBNA’s side which is linked. This is MBCG’ side. Isn’t that both sides? Okay, he could have reached out to Nelson and DOT’s to get their take but this was a report on MBCG’s meeting and the story was very long anyway. Nelson is quite capable of making a comment. Lew Fidler often comments here. I’m not sure what either of them would have said anyway that would have improved the article. It’s obvious that DOT does not agree with MBCG’s proposals, and all Nelson could have said was what you said that other budget priorities were more important than the dog run. I’m not saying Zalcman was right, but if a promise was made. it should have been kept or else not made in the first place, if in fact a promise was really made.

      I think “enemies” was a proper term since the parties have not gotten along and have attacked each other repeatedly. I’m not getting into the question of is Zalcman competent to represent Manhattan Beach because I don’t see how that is relevant to the article. As far as Nelson taking an interest in any of the projects, I think he is referring to items presently on the table, not past projects like getting funding for the planters. As far as removing them, I didn’t realize he played a hand in that. If that is true, then Zalcman’s comment was out of line.

      DOT removed the planter’s to shut them up which both groups supported. The fact that MBCG is still feuding with DOT, and has not granted any of their demands recently while granting a few concessions to MBNA (daylighting, stop signs, speed bump) doesn’t change the enemy status.

      I agree that the commissioner doesn’t have to bend over backwards to please them especially when many of their ideas wouldn’t even improve the traffic situation and could possibly make things worse, like additional traffic lights.

      Asking someone to stand up and denounce racism is not the same as calling someone a racist. Zalcman never did that. As far as the beach parking, I already commented on that. He might have gone a little to far by saying that the push to ban barbecuing is a push to privatize the beach, but it definitely is a push to get fewer people from outside the area to use the beach and park. As I previously stated that the real reason for MBNA’s proposal to ban barbecuing has nothing to do with health. It’s something they were always against (to keep “those” people out) and feel because of the recent legislation to ban smoking on the beaches, now would be a politically good time to try to ban barbecuing. I also don’t believe that MBCG feels any differently.

      I also don’t see the signatures on the petition as being authentic or not relevant to the article. What would you have expected Ned to do about that anyway?

      • http://www.flickr.com/photos/lisanne001 Lisanne!

        I rather suspect that reasoned discussion is not going to make of an impact. Ned is not being biased, nevertheless he owes no explanation at all to this party for his choices of issue and event coverage, or of his presentation of that. As you see, when someone HAS an agenda, which appears to be the case here, that person might wish to use the space here to propagate their OPINION, regardless of whether it has the appearance of being libelous.

        As this party has alienated numerous people here I cannot consider his/her “points” to be worth consideration.

  • swim

    There are even greater issues to be tended to in Manhattan Beach right now like the vast rise in crime that this neighborhood is being targeted for. Specifically breaking into cars and the assault and mugging of people walking the streets. SWIM has personally intervened in four recent incidents, starting from West End ave block and further up, helping each time to prevent an assault or robbery. That is not SWIMs job, risking their own well being each time but good morals don’t allow to just let something like that happen and not help. Security around here must be increased and I mean NYPD rolling through, not the useless BRS, who would probably end up a victim when he comes to intervene, let alone the time he takes to arrive. Put some cameras on your houses and keep your eyes open. Or will this big issue only come to light when the next situation ends up as a homicide. And to the ignorant people writing Manhattan Beach is retarded, you are just a fool with nothing of more value to say. Maybe some of the people who inherited their home here aren’t the sharpest crayon in the box, but every single person who purchased or built house here from scratch is a wealthy and successful person who is in no way retarded. Keep your eyes peeled people, I wish for all of you to be safe and for this garbage to stay out of the neighborhood.

    • nolastname

      Welcome to our world. This coming from one of the middle class folks excluded out of your haven. Give me a break with the explanation of the inhabitants. Greed, gluttony and envy surround you all.
      You want more NYPD than the rest of us tax payers, good luck.
      What happened to the private security?
      Can’t park on your streets, no access to the esplanade, destroy the foot bridge?
      The past record for Manhattan beach speaks for itself. Leave us alone. Stay the f out, don’t bring your families here to BBQ.
      You can’t have your cake and eat it too.
      One or two do-gooders does not make for a whole community.

      • nolastname

        PS> I have not been bought out.