By Arkadiy Fridman and Ilya Galak

In the end, the vote was overwhelming.

“For far too long, dozens of thousands of the Russian-American senior citizens of New York have been shut out of the voting process unfairly because of the language barrier,” pontificated State Sen. Carl Kruger when he introduced the legislation. Passed by the New York state Senate 48 to14 on May 28, the bill, known as S. 552 – An act to amend the election law in relation to providing Russian-language voting materials” passed the state Assembly with only 23 members dissenting out of 132 votes cast.

Russian was thereby added to the list of existing alternate languages in which election material must be printed, the others being Spanish, Chinese and Korean.

Those who argued for the passage of the law — and New York’s City Hall was not among them because of the tremendous expense complying with the law would entail — pointed to the 1 to 1.5 million Russian-speaking residents of the New York metropolitan area; part of a community in which 320,000 were born in Russia or other countries of the Soviet Union. Some districts boasted Russian-speaking populations of more than 20 percent, who the politicians felt were being disenfranchised by the lack of Russian language voting materials. Those officials felt that they weren’t being given an opportunity to represent ALL citizens in their district, because those who could not read English could not register to vote.

The act purported to enfranchise “another of [New York’s] culturally diverse immigrant populations, like many that have come before it.”

A CLOSER LOOK

Questions arise, however, about whether the bill was justifiable in these tough economic times — or even necessary. Those who are even more skeptical will point to such a bill and call it a bribe, buying the votes of a growing and powerful minority. What other reason could there be to spend money on such a bill, when unemployment hovers around 10 percent and deficits stretch as far as the eye can see?

There are other reasons to oppose this bill. Political writer and founder of the Eagle Forum, Phyllis Schlafly, reminds us that to become a citizen our laws require that you demonstrate “an understanding of the English language, including an ability to read, write and speak … simple words and phrases … in ordinary usage in the English language.”

When discussing the wisdom of translating election material, Schlafly issued a stern warning:

“Printing ballots in foreign languages is fundamentally anti-democratic because fair elections depend on public debate on the issues and candidates. People who don’t understand the public debate are subject to manipulation by political-action groups that can mislead them in language translations and then tell them how to vote.”

The underlying theme here is to accept or reject the value of assimilation; the willingness of a minority population to cast off the culture of his or her birth and embrace the culture of their newly-chosen country.

One could argue that the America that was the great “Melting Pot” produced the strongest and greatest country in the world, as diverse populations and ethnicities melded to form a people with a strong, blue-collar work ethic, a belief in the importance of education and advancement, a love of democracy that would keep Europe free through two world wars, and a willingness to create a military that would be the liberators of millions.

RIGHT TO THE POINT

Perhaps no one has ever said it more elegantly, and more directly, than President Theodore Roosevelt. He wrote these words in a letter to the president of the American Defense Society on January 3, 1919, just three days before he died:

“In the first place, we should insist that if the immigrant who comes here in good faith becomes an American and assimilates himself to us, he shall be treated on an exact equality with everyone else, for it is an outrage to discriminate against any such man because of creed, or birthplace, or origin.

But this is predicated upon the person’s becoming in every facet an American and nothing but an American. … There can be no divided allegiance here. Any man who says he is an American, but something else also, isn’t an American at all. We have room for but one flag, the American flag. … We have room for but one language here, and that is the English language. … and we have room for but one sole loyalty and that is a loyalty to the American people.”

As Teddy Roosevelt grew older, he increasingly seized on the theme of “Americanization.” He warned of the dangers of “hyphenated-Americans” and predicted disaster for the United State if it were to become a “tangle of squabbling nationalities”

He wanted the English language to become compulsory learning. “Every immigrant who comes here,” he said, “should be required within five years to learn English or to leave the country.” In a statement to the Kansas City Star in 1918 he said, “English should be the only language taught or used in the public schools.”

He also insisted, on more than one occasion, that America has no room for what he called “fifty-fifty allegiance.” In a speech made in 1917 he said, “It is our boast that we admit the immigrant to full fellowship and equality with the native-born. In return we demand that he shall share our undivided allegiance to the one flag which floats over all of us.”

AN INFORMAL SURVEY

In an effort to gauge the feelings of the Russian community, I engaged people on the streets of Brighton Beach in Brooklyn, one of the oldest Russian enclaves in New York, and still as vibrant and thriving as ever.

I followed a simple methodology: I went out on the street, introduced myself as a journalist and began to ask elderly people, for whom this law was passed, what they felt about the bill. Admittedly, I did not act by all the rules of statistical science, but it didn’t take long for the attitude of those I interviewed to become clear.

The first thing I realized was that pride was a factor in those who applauded the measure — perhaps even more so than necessity. The passage of the bill was a sign of “respect” to some of those I interviewed, a manifestation of political clout, recognition that the Russian community was a force to be reckoned with — or at least paid attention to.

But many saw the bill as disrespectful and hypocritical. When asked if the law was necessary, a common answer was, simply, “No.”

After all they speak English — and they are the OVERWHELMING majority. Doctors, lawyers, programmers, engineers, government employees, skilled workers, policemen — why do they need any of this?

More than that, I feel bad for our children. With the instatement of this law, in a way, they become second class citizens. I doubt that those people born in the U.S. will treat them better after this.

On the contrary, the society presently is very politicized and all are watching how government money is appropriated. And by so much noise being made out of something like this, then by passing this law, our children are being thrown under the bus.

Even the elderly, who have a difficult time learning a new language, have outlets from which they get their news and current events:

We have the privately owned Russian-speaking Davidson radio, oriented especially toward those people who speak English poorly. This radio copes perfectly with those functions, which the politicians want to take upon themselves.

This radio, at the cost of its owners, informs us regarding all local political news. Here politicians present their pre-election speeches, accounting for the work they have done. That is where everything is explained to us, I would even say — everything relative to an election is broken down to its smallest components.

A SIMPLE CONCLUSION

In conclusion, we don’t really have a need for these translations. I don’t know who is going to be reading them, when all this can be heard on the radio in a form that is a lot more interesting and less officious.

Other than that, I have never had any problems at the voting polls. Respectful Russian–speaking volunteers showed and explained everything.

It appears that the motivation behind this bill was painfully transparent — it was a dishonest and disrespectful misjudging of the Russian community by the politicians.

“In my humble opinion, I just don’t understand real purpose of this bill,” immigrant Boris Borovoy states flatly. “The majority of politically active Russian-Americans are fluent in English and have no need for a Russian translation; to me it’s another pork barrel, another waste of taxpayers’ money for a mostly symbolic purpose.

And for hard-working, middle-class Russian-Americans it’s real slap in a face. “Want to make some important political decisions? Learn English, comrade. That’s as simple as it gets”.

Lucy Gunderson translated an article title “Voluntary Segregation” by Yevgeny Novitsky, published in the newspaper Russian Bazaar. In the article, Novitsky analyzes the bill and laments that “lack of English completely cuts people off from the real America. They are forced to communicate with people who have a very limited range of interests.”

Novitsky’s analysis cuts like a knife to the heart of the matter, expressing his pity at those who would consider the bill to be an historic event. And in a final declaration of the independent American people of Russian descent, he cries:

“I would be far happier if one fine day New York officials were to announce that the Russian-speaking community no longer existed. Then Gov. Paterson would say something like, ‘Russian-speaking immigrants have melded so seamlessly into American life that it is no longer possible to separate them into a distinct ethnic enclave. We can now proudly call them Americans of Russian descent.’

“Then the group of loud enthusiasts who call themselves ‘community leaders’ would stop speaking on behalf of the entire Russian-language community. Redundant associations and coalitions that exist mostly because of the language barrier would disappear. And to the proposals by officials to translate materials into Russian, every one of ‘our’ U.S. citizens would answer indignantly but proudly, “Who do you take me for? I AM AN AMERICAN.”

Arkadiy Fridman , a former Soviet Army officer who came to the United States in 1992, heads the not-for-profit Staten Island Community Center in Dongan Hills and is the president of Citizens magazine. Ilya Galak, an electrical engineer, has been in the United States since 1989 and is on the staff of Citizens magazine. This article originally appears in Citizens magazine and was also published on SILive.com.

Related posts

  • http://www.flickr.com/photos/lisanne001 Lisanne!

    And what of all of the members of countless other national backgrounds who were not covered by this bill? Why did this bill provide accommodation for only one group?

    This is definitely suggestive of a nod made to those in Russian-American community (sorry TR) who are politically active. They might have desired a show of commitment to their community by elected officials. Regardless of the lack of need for such legislative action.

  • Gene2

    It’s pretty sad that couple of comrades decided to stick out of the general population and illustrate with this poor, waste of time and space article their own opinions.

    Author:
    “And for hard-working, middle-class Russian-Americans it’s real slap in a face. “Want to make some important political decisions? Learn English, comrade. That’s as simple as it gets”.”

    Middle class…? I though we are talking about senior citizens?

    Author:
    “For far too long, dozens of thousands of the Russian-American senior citizens of New York have been shut out of the voting process unfairly because of the language barrier,”—–This is first sentence!

    So .. who are we talking about here?

    The only reason why politicians like Mr.Crooker want all these materials to be printed in Russian is for him to get Russian votes, simple as that. For the most part Russian seniors vote who you tell them to vote for. (old habit from ussr days)

    All other groups of Russians… that are able to vote and over 18… speak English in one form or the other so no need for them to have these kind of forms. Except for students who started to come from Russia recently.. .. they cant vote and senior citizens who are simply too old to learn anything except for latest news from russian news channels.

    Let me just say that .. more English you learn the more you realize that you as an individual can not make any important political decisions contradicting what authors stated in this article.

    • Guest

      Russian community is not only the group of the seniors on Brighton Beach. This is a really small part only. But politically really active in this area. Because of the Davidzon radio…
      95% are well educated businessmen, doctors, lawyers, engineers, skilled workers.
      This is a smack to their face. Because of many people are not educated enough to realize what is going on.
      They will just simply will hate Russians even more…

      • Gene2

        There is only one thing in common between vacuum cleaner and Davidzon radio, they both SUCK~! Its horrible, the bred that they spread is like a nightmare. Radio station itself has no meaning and no substance.

  • Cabbie

    Teddy Roosevelt for President!

    • BrooklynBus

      Its deja vu all over again.

    • levp

      Or his cousin, Franklin D.

  • Anonymous

    That’s it, I am converting.

    • levp

      What, you need a “special deal” for a water cleaner for “only” $20 per month, courtesy of an infomercial on the Davidzon Radio?
      Not worth converting, believe me. If now I can only persuade my mother to turn the damn thing off (or, at least, switch the station)…

      • Anonymous

        Or turn down the volume, please!

  • Guest

    That is how the Brooklyn democrats try to buy the votes

    • levp

      Judging by the vote tally, not only Brooklyn and not only Democrats – the Russians are really taking over!!!

  • Jamesforsyth

    WTF? English is the language normally spoken in the U.S. and if one does not understand it there are courses to teach it. If someone wishes to live here, learning the language is just part of the experience.

  • levp

    If only “our” U.S. citizens would embrace equality equally (pun intended) for other ethnicities, races and languages… Say, accept that U.S. citizen who speak Arabic (or Pushtu, or Farsi, etc.) are also U.S. citizen just like them, with the same rights. Including the right to free exercise of religion…

  • levp

    “We demand that he shall share our undivided allegiance to the one flag which floats over all of us.”

    Exactly.

    Wait, that means Teddy Roosevelt was out to destroy Israel too (ZOMG!) – or, maybe, its actually time to stop this other “fifty-fifty allegiance.”
    OK, who wants to pitch this idea to Davidzon Radio?

  • Anonymous

    well. there goes the democratic vote. since russians all (maybe not all, but many) proclaim to be republicans. clearly not knowing or acknowledging the hand that feeds them (i.e. medicare, medicaid etc), thanks to the republican sponsored rtn channel.

  • Anonymous

    and yes, you’re in america now, learn english. if my 85 year old great-grandmother was able to do…..

  • Pingback: How to Buy Omega-3 Supplements | Omega 3 Oil Benefits

  • Pingback: Chance to win a Mahindra Bike | Motor Bike Online

  • Pingback: Planning a Motorbike Tour | Motor Bike Online

  • http://www.polilingua.com/languages/russian_translation.htm Editor

    Yes, everyone can learn English language, just need a strong motivation. I our days there a lot of possibilities to do it quickly and free of charge.

  • M.A.D.

    I think that if this bill and the ballots in the native language help even one voter or at least make the voting process less confusing, then the bill should have been passed. Why should the russian community be singled out after all? There are ballots in chinese and spanish, so why not in russian? The 10% unemployment will not go down simply because additional ballots/voting materials are printed in another language – its all pennies considering the financial hole this state is in.

    Author says “I feel bad for our children. With the instatement of this law, in a way, they become second class citizens. I doubt that those people born in the U.S. will treat them better after this.” This is ludicrous. WHat is a second-class citizen?
    And if there is such a class, who are in the first and in the third class? It is pure stupidity to say that children have less rights simply because the ballots are printed in their parents’ native language.

    As for Davidzon radio…The bill was aimed at getting the senior citizen’s to the poll. It wasn’t aimed at getting doctors and lawyers and engineers there. Senior citizens are provided transportation and lunch courtesy of Davidzon radio and they vote for whoever Davidzon supports. I don’t even know if that doesn’t conflict voting laws. Great for Davidzon – as they can get more political $$$ and contributions that way and continue to be the radio station with no substance, advertisements only. Sucks for those senior citizens because they only hear one side.

    I agree that this bill was about buying the votes. But so was the chinese and the spanish bills as well. After all, if russians are forced to learn english, shouldn’t every other immigrant group be forced as well?

    • Guest

      When discussing the wisdom of translating election material, Schlafly issued a stern warning:

      “Printing ballots in foreign languages is fundamentally anti-democratic because fair elections depend on public debate on the issues and candidates. People who don’t understand the public debate are subject to manipulation by political-action groups that can mislead them in language translations and then tell them how to vote.”

      • M.A.D.

        My point was that if the election materials are already being printed out in languages other than russian, than they should be printed out in russian as well.

        And, Guest, your Schlafly quote is in the article. I don’t agree with her anyway.

        If those ballots help one person to get to the voting poll, than its a good thing. Whether or how they make a decision on who to vote for is no one’s business. There are plenty of americans who don’t know the name of their state senator, or even better Vice President of the United States. Its no one’s fault, but their own. So if someone gets manipulated, its only because they let others to manipulate them. This is no reason to prevent that person from casting their vote.

  • emes

    To vote, you need to be a citizen. To be a citizen, you need to pass an English proficiency exam. Why do people need voting materials in foreign languages if they need to be proficient in English to be eligible to vote anyway?

  • Anonymous

    very interesting article! I will follow your themes.
    Can I subscribe to your posts on Twitter or on your Facebook profile?
    Custom Thesis
    Term papers
    Application essay

    http://www.revisionlabs.com/