• Grillin On The Bay - March 27, 2010

Brooklyn Dreams Charter School hearing at Shell Bank J.H.S. in Sheepshead Bay
(Photo by Daniel Cavanagh)

Last night’s hearing on the Brooklyn Dreams Charter School went much as expected: an unremarkable turnout of local and citywide charter opponents, with a smattering – an itsy, bitsy smattering – of advocates. To say the least, the opposition – though equally impassioned in their rhetoric – paled in comparison to the attendance at the Hebrew Language Academy hearing at Marine Park J.H.S.

The most compelling news of the night came from BDCS officials, who continued to reassure attendees that the school had no intention of seeking space carved from existing public schools. In fact, they informed, they’ve found a location at 269 Parkville Avenue (see map), near Ocean Parkway just north of Avenue H. One of the schools representatives added, “We are not looking to move into a public school. I don’t even believe in that. I think that’s wrong.”

In the stifling heat of the Shell Bank J.H.S. auditorium, the news did little to soothe opponents, who early on were reminded by SUNY Charter School Institute officials that the “final decision [on BDCS] rests with SUNY” and is not a direct result of the sentiments shared at the hearing.

And sentiments they did share. Opposition at the meeting was concentrated mainly on three points:

  1. District 22 is an exemplary district and so a charter school is superfluous
  2. Charters shave off good students and needed funds, thus threatening the district’s success
  3. BDCS, like other charters, is not a unionized school

On this last point it’s worth noting that a significant portion of the crowd was educators and members of the United Federation of Teachers (so much so, one attendee, undecided on the issue, told me he was angered at what he called a “union fest”). They called the school – and the charter system in general – anti-union. The only response by BDCS officials was to point out that they were not anti-union, they just weren’t unionized. “If we were required to be unionized than we would,” was the response of one official – take it for what it’s worth.

As to the first two points, BDCS officials and supporters argued primarily that this was about offering options. Performance-wise, district 22 is not in the doldroms. But the area is lacking options, particular the option of a different atmosphere and smaller class sizes.

Needless to say, such explanations did little for the audience. Faint murmers, boos and hisses rustled through the crowd.

Following the BDCS’s shoestring presentation – which notably lacked any sort of presentation – District 22’s Community Education Council (CEC) began interrogating and chiding BDCS officials for moving in on their territory. Christopher Spinelli, president of the CEC, and others from the group elicited cheers from the audience for laying into BDCS’s sales pitch regarding smaller class sizes. We all want smaller class sizes, he said, but charter’s are accomplishing that at the expense of the public school system.

Furthermore, district 22 “is a model for all of New York City, if not the nation,” he said. “If it ain’t broken, don’t fix it.” Cue cheers.

Others who spoke in this vein included State Assemblyman William Colton and Councilman Lew Fidler – who also spoke for Councilman Maisel. Fidler, with the fiery rhetoric of a politician in a reelection period, repeated much of what he told us last week. State Senator Golden sent a representative – a smart move, given that he was going on record as supporting BDCS. His rep quickly blurted into the microphone that Golden regretted not being able to attend and show his support. The four second statement sparked boos, but only after the audience got over their shock at the abruptness of it all.

The most excitement came when James Bernard, a board member at Excelsior, spoke. Excelsior is another charter school run by National Heritage Academies, and he is extremely satisfied with the organization. He has also helped BDCS officials navigate the system. Shouting from his seat in the auditorium (and receiving plenty of shouts right back), Bernard argued to SUNY officials that the meeting was not representative of the community’s sentiment. The school, afterall, had collected around 1,100 signatures from supportive residents. When I approached Bernard – and BDCS officials – afterwards, it was revealed that the signatures were collected over time by standing on street corners. BDCS reps explained the school to potential signees, leaving little room for opposition in an immensely complicated issue. Still, 1,100 signatures is no small thing.

In the end, as was said in the beginning, BDCS officials will make the decision. And given that the meeting was dominated by UFT members and not parents, it’s hard to say whether they’ll take the views expressed at the meeting to heart. Meanwhile, the school has supplied SUNY with 1,100 petitions from the community.

Based on last night’s meeting, I’d say we’ll be calling BDCS a neighbor pretty soon.

  • Debra Calvo
    Hard to have parents in attendance when you hold hearings in July.
  • I gotta say. I agree.

    All through Elementary School, JHS I was an honor student in the top of my class, but somewhere along the line our school system failed me horribly. I know I can't lay all the blame elsewhere, I need to own up to some of it, but before JHS I LOVED learning, and school and being smart. Then at some point I shut off, like a flip was switched. Eventually Jr Year at Sheepshead I fell out of honors and that whole spiral extended to College.

    I don't care what bullshit our politicians spout. Our school system sucks. It's horrible.
  • SB
    I don't know much about this school so I'll openly admit I am not the most qualified to speak on the larger issues at hand here. That being said as someone in college now who went through the District 22 education system I have to say that the prospect of a charter school sounds appealing. I don't know what they'd do at BDCS curriculum-wise but the argument regarding this school potentially shaving off "good students" is one that irks me. I was a "good student" and frankly I think I got the short end of the stick as far as bumping up test scores goes. Overcrowded schools (and district 22 is no exception especially with the great degree of bussing that brings students from outside the district in) don't allow for "good students" to receive the attention they need. For all the times my teachers back in elementary school and junior high stopped to repeat something for a student who needed it, I doubt they gave me an extra push to do more. That being said, I do feel I got a good education. I won't deny that fact. My teachers were overall very capable educators and I received a foundation to succeed in high school and am now doing well at college. However though good students do generally thrive despite the enivronment I don't think that makes it ok for them to just "thrive". If a child has the ability to do more they should be encouraged to so. Frankly, one doesn't even know how much a child can accomplish until they're given room to spread their wings. If a charter school would allow that then so be it, especially if this charter school is in Sheepshead Bay. There aren't many options for families around here. If you're not happy private school isn't a very viable either on account of the expense or the distance. We have some religious schools in the area but I think it's a good thing for Sheepshead Bay to gain another alternative to education. As Brooklyn becomes hotter and hotter more young families are moving here and I worry that neighborhoods like Sheepshead, because there are farther away from Manhattan are going to be left behind. A unique option for education might help the neighborhood keep pace with the rest of the borough.
  • Videos of the meeting posted at:
    http://ednotesonline.blogspot.com/2009/07/video...

    For the record, it cerainly seemed to me there were only a few UFT people who spoke. More parents than teachers spoke. And a few principals and CSA. I and another teacher spoke but we are vehement critics of the UFT leadership.

    And I would check whether BDCS has actually signed the deal for that Parkville St address. They didn't even seem sure exactly where it was.
  • You're right, it was a very poor "presentation" - no information on curriculum, specific educational targets, innovative teaching methods - nothing. And no response to the question of what the school will add in terms of choice to the already broad spectrum of options within District 22.




    It should be noted that this is the school's THIRD application. If they didn't have their act together after going through these motions two previous times, then what are we to take from how well they will prepare children for the future?





    Not a great "third" first impression.
blog comments powered by Disqus